This post may contain affiliate links, which means I may receive a commission from purchases made through these links. The reputation of Nexa is important; that’s why I will only recommend products I have personally reviewed or tested.
The digital age is characterized by a multitude of possibilities. However, this vast choice also invites a daunting question: Which pathway to tread when investing in a smart home setup? At the crossroads stand two formidable options: cloud-based and local systems. The daunting question of choice isn’t helped by the fact that the industry is scattered with an array of incompatible standards. Still, fear not; this article will serve as your guiding star through this complex galaxy, to assist you in the task of selection and initiation.
Now, you might have come across the term ‘smart home’ thrown around quite a bit. But, what does it entail? What is a smart home? Well, it’s quite simple. A smart home signifies a household where multiple devices harmoniously interact in an automated fashion. This concept is a subset of a larger idea: the Internet of Things. To visualize it better, imagine your smartphone or computer operating system. For all the apps to function in unison, they must share a common ‘language’. This language, or a method of communication, forms the basis of a smart home system.
Let’s dive deeper.
It’s essential to comprehend the heart of these systems: the hub. It connects all devices compatible with the ‘language’ of the smart home system. It regulates triggers, responses, and automation, ensuring seamless interaction between your smart devices.
Now, let’s discuss the two species that inhabit the smart home cosmos: Cloud-based systems and Local systems.
Imagine the sky above filled with clouds. In the context of smart home systems, these clouds serve as the powerhouse of automation software, which is only accessible through the internet. This is the core of cloud-based systems like Apple HomeKit, Google Home, Amazon Alexa, or Homey. The devices connect to these celestial bodies (clouds) directly or through a central hub. This is where you’ll find renowned devices like Alexa, Google Nest, or Apple HomePod, the lifeblood of your smart home system.
However, it’s not all sunny skies. On a cloudy day, when the internet connection gives up the ghost, the entire system suffers. For instance, without an internet connection, your cloud-based smart lock won’t be able to automatically light up the corridor.
In contrast, local systems are the old-school rock bands in this digital concert. They are self-contained, housing all automation and control software within your home. Local systems aren’t dependent on an internet connection, but they can definitely reap its benefits when available. These systems use physical wires or local wireless connections like ZigBee, Z-Wave, etc., instead of relying on Wi-Fi and the cloud.
Let’s juxtapose both for clarity:
| Cloud-based systems | Local integrations |
|---|---|
| Examples: Apple HomeKit, Google Home, Amazon Alexa, Homey | Examples: FIBARO, Grenton, Loxone, Ampio, eeDomus, Jeedom |
| Primarily based on internet connection and online software | Primarily connects devices via wires or local wireless links |
| Voice assistant compatibility | Limited voice assistant compatibility |
| Dependent on internet connection | Can operate without the internet |
| Relatively DIY-friendly | Usually calls for professional installation |
Does this mean you have to pick sides? Not necessarily. For instance, Google Home could be used for music streaming and light synchronization, while smart locks and security systems could operate on FIBARO. However, the degree of interactivity between two such systems could be limited or non-existent. Your choice would depend on the level of device control you need and whether the devices must be integrated into shared scenes or routines.
As for which option to choose, it’s subjective to your circumstances. Should you be orchestrating a fresh space, a system grounded on local networks may present greater dependability, though it might demand a hefty financial commitment and bears a confined scope for device interoperability. Conversely, cloud-based configurations, a counterpoint, are typically straightforward to establish, supervise, and fine-tune. They emerge as an optimal choice for individuals residing in apartments, leaseholders, or for those who desire to promptly initialize a smart dwelling without straining their wallet. Furthermore, numerous pre-existing setups, such as temperature controls, can be conveniently transformed into components of a smart home ecosystem at an affordable expense.
Remember, the path to digital domestic bliss is fraught with choices. Hopefully, this guide has provided you with a compass to navigate this complex terrain.
